Mn. Bronstein et al., UNEXPECTED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FAT MASS AND BASAL METABOLIC-RATE IN PREGNANT-WOMEN, British Journal of Nutrition, 75(5), 1996, pp. 659-668
We investigated the relationships between BMR, fat-free mass (FFM) and
fat mass in pregnancy, BMR was measured by indirect calorimetry and b
ody composition was assessed by densitometry in seventeen non-pregnant
women (79.9 (SD 26.3, range 50.5-151.4) kg) and sixteen pregnant wome
n (75.7 (SD 20.6, range 54.5-115.9) kg). The pregnant women were evalu
ated during weeks 31-35 of gestation, Multiple regression analysis of
BMR with FFM and fat mass in the non-pregnant women showed that FFM wa
s a highly significant predictor of BMR (P < 0.0001), but fat mass was
not (P = 0.09). In contrast, in the pregnant women, multiple regressi
on analysis revealed that fat mass was a highly significant predictor
(P < 0.001), while FFM was not (P = 0.69). Evaluation of the interacti
on terms in the combined data set confirmed that the relationships of
BMR with FFM and fat mass differ significantly in non-pregnant and pre
gnant women. It is proposed that pregnancy represents a unique conditi
on during which BMR is regulated by maternal adipose reserves, An augm
ented BMR in overweight pregnant women may be protective, given that e
xcessive weight gain may be detrimental to neonatal and maternal healt
h.