Dl. Wallace et al., BETTER REVISION IN 8 MINUTES - PROMPTING FIRST-YEAR COLLEGE WRITERS TO REVISE GLOBALLY, Journal of educational psychology, 88(4), 1996, pp. 682-688
Two experiments examined the relation between revision and task defini
tion among college students in writing courses. In Experiment 1, stude
nts prompted to make global revisions to their drafts of college appli
cation letters improved their drafts more than students not prompted t
o make global revisions. Results of Experiment 1 extended results of D
. L. Wallace and J. R. Hayes (1991), who found the same effect for stu
dents revising text they had not written. In Experiment 2, the treatme
nt did not improve revisions by college students (identified as measur
ed by low SAT verbal scores) who completed the same writing task. Toge
ther, results of these 2 experiments suggest that the prompt to revise
globally may be effective in helping entry-level college writing stud
ents improve their texts (the prompt seems to have encouraged them to
make better revisions) but that it is not effective in helping basic-l
evel college writing students revise.