An open-ended, dilemma-free method was used to evaluate Gilligan's cla
ims that Kohlberg's moral judgment stage scoring is biased against fem
ales, and that there are gender-related differences in moral orientati
on (defined in the present study as the prominence with which certain
concerns are used in stage content expression). Participants (n = 543)
aged 9-81 years and including delinquents were assessed with the Soci
omoral Reflection Measure-Short Form (SRM-SF). In moral judgment stage
, females were more advanced than males during early adolescence. Care
-related and ethically ideal expressions were more prevalent in female
s' moral judgment. Hence, Gilligan's claim of stage bias was rejected,
but some support was found for her claim of gender-related moral orie
ntation differences.