INERT KNOWLEDGE - ANALYSES AND REMEDIES

Citation
A. Renkl et al., INERT KNOWLEDGE - ANALYSES AND REMEDIES, Educational psychologist, 31(2), 1996, pp. 115-121
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational
Journal title
ISSN journal
00461520
Volume
31
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
115 - 121
Database
ISI
SICI code
0046-1520(1996)31:2<115:IK-AAR>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Knowledge, although seemingly available, is often not used for problem solving. That means it remains ''inert.'' Three types of explanations exist for this phenomenon. Metaprocess explanations assume that the r elevant knowledge is available, but it is not used because of disturbe d access processes (e.g., lacking metacognitive control). Structure de ficit explanations suppose that the deficit is rooted in the structure of the knowledge itself (i.e., the knowledge is not available in a fo rm that allows for its application). In situatedness explanations, the traditional concepts of knowledge and transfer are questioned. One ba sic assumption of this perspective is that knowledge is fundamentally situated (i.e., context-bound). In the last decade, instructional mode ls have been developed that try to remedy the inert knowledge problem and take into account important aspects that have been raised by the d ifferent explanations.