Immersion biotesting has long been used to challenge pack ages, partic
ularly cans, for pinholes and channel leaks. Such testing for all type
s of plastic packaging may not be appropriate because some packages (e
.g., aseptic, hot fill) are not exposed to water. As the food-packagin
g industry develops alternative environmental biotests there is a need
to benchmark them against traditional immersion testing. The purpose
of this research was to examine the threshold of critical-defect dimen
sions using artifically created channel leaks of 10 and 20 mu m and 5-
and 10-mm lengths sealed into plastic pouches which were subsequently
tested by immersion at 10(2) and 10(6) CFU of motile and nonmotile Ps
eudomonas fragi TM849 per mi. Forty-four percent (44%) of the pouches
tested became contaminated, indicating the threshold defect value is b
elow 10 mu m. Microbial ingress was significant (P < .05) for motile t
est organisms with a concentration of 10(6) CFU/ml. The interaction of
concentration and time was also significant at 10(2) CFU/ml at 30 min
exposure and 10(6) CFU/ml at 15 min. Channel length was not statistic
ally significant. The markedly greater contamination rate using immers
ion testing versus that of aerosol testing highlights the importance o
f using test methods that reflect environmental exposure conditions of
the packages.