Bj. Braman et al., FACILITATED COMMUNICATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM - AN EXAMINATION OF FACE VALIDITY, BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 21(1), 1995, pp. 110-118
Although there has been ample controversy about the need for validatio
n studies of facilitated communication (FC), FC proponents have outlin
ed minimum guidelines for increasing the naturalistic manner in which
FC is examined. In this investigation, the face validity of FC was exa
mined with attention to these guidelines. Three children with autism w
ho used FC to communicate participated in the study. Sentence completi
on statements in which the correct responses were alternately known or
unknown to the facilitator were presented using a variation of a mult
iple-treatment design. Special consideration was given to previous cri
ticisms of controlled investigations of FC in the development of the m
ethod. A total of 240 responses were evaluated in relation to form acc
uracy (spelling) and content accuracy (correct or incorrect answer) us
ing a 10-point rating scale. The data from this study strongly suggest
that the content of the responses was influenced systematically by fa
cilitators.