American public and professional attitudes toward the idea of the urba
n university have always been ambivalent and confused, if not hostile
and resistant, in keeping with tendencies toward metrophobia, or fear
of the city and its people. Furthermore, definitions of and criteria f
or the urban university have suffered from ambiguity, thus exacerbatin
g negative attitudes toward it. Uncovering the reasons for these views
toward and definitions of the urban university requires analyses that
are both rhetorical and historical. Sources of resistance to the urba
n university are found in the rural and small town traditions of colon
ial, state, and land grant institutions in the United States. Further
indication of ambivalence and ambiguity is the current rhetorical move
that poses what used to be called urban problems as metropolitan or h
uman problems and the corresponding reconceptualizations of urban univ
ersities as metropolitan or generic, thus deflecting attention from ur
ban institutions and inner cities.