This paper evaluates the achievement of 'direct democracy' in Communit
y Ownership schemes. Community Ownership is a programme in Scotland to
create small, community-based housing associations and cooperatives i
n areas of former council housing. The paper reviews four different vi
ews of direct democracy: as a form of radical politics; as a means of
encouraging better or more rational decision making; as a method of ro
lling back the state, improving competition and consumer choice; and a
s a way of improving liberal democracy. It concludes that Community Ow
nership is neither radical politics nor privatisation, but that it has
resulted in better service provision and has provided some limited de
mocratic benefits.