B. Grobecker, RECONSTRUCTING THE PARADIGM OF LEARNING-DISABILITIES - A HOLISTIC CONSTRUCTIVIST INTERPRETATION/, Learning disability quarterly, 19(3), 1996, pp. 179-200
The paradigm for defining learning disabilities has evolved in relatio
n to information-processing constructs of learning and intelligence. A
ssumptions regarding the nature of knowledge acquisition as well as as
sessment and remedial techniques that are derived from such a paradigm
are currently being challenged. This article argues that learning dif
ferences can be best understood, and attended to, in relation to the h
olistic/constructivist theory of knowledge construction and the recipr
ocal evolution of cognitive structures. Knowledge is conceived of as b
eing embedded in, and subordinated to, a spiral of mental structuring
activity that guides relational thinking or logic, Symbols (i.e., lang
uage, numbers, and images) are tools that exercise mental structuring
activity for the purpose of transforming and enriching individual lear
ning spirals by coordinating and integrating its energy form, Reciproc
ally, greater depth and flexibility in knowledge bases evolve, which s
erve to transform persons and their cultures. It is in these spirals o
f mental structuring activity that learning differences are proposed t
o manifest themselves. Such a perspective shifts the focus of assessme
nt and remediation away from specific skill development that attends t
o standard answers and ways of solving problems to an examination of t
he adaptive, transforming thinking activity (mental constructs) genera
ted to solve for answers. By making contact with and guiding individua
lly constructed realities through techniques such as graded learning l
oops in the zone of proximal development, learning behaviors become mo
re adaptable and generalizable.