In this research, biodata items were evaluated for their perceived inv
asiveness by over 200 professionals (psychologists and social scientis
ts), as well as three samples of nonprofessionals. In addition to item
subject matter, perceived invasiveness of items was related to variou
s biodata attributes, in that items that were more verifiable, more tr
ansparent in purpose, and more impersonal were seen as less invasive.
Subjects with more positive attitudes toward biodata and organizationa
l selection measures viewed fewer items as invasive, as did those with
more education. Dispositional variables and gender were related to in
vasiveness perceptions in some samples. Four general motives or topics
were determined to generate the greatest concern: fear of stigmatizat
ion, concern about having applicants recall traumatic events, intimacy
, and religion. The results may help develop consensus about defining
''invasive'' and contribute to ways of reducing perceptions of invasiv
eness.