TOTAL-BODY PROTEIN STATUS ASSESSED BY DIFFERENT ESTIMATES OF FAT-FREEMASS IN ADULT PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENTS

Objective: To assess the usefulness of fat-free mass (FFM) as an index of total body protein (TBPr) status in continuous ambulatory peritone al dialysis (CAPD) patients. Design: TBPr was measured by in vivo neut ron activation analysis (IVNAA) and expressed as a standardised protei n index (PI). FFM was estimated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (D XA), whole body counting of total body potassium (TBK), and creatinine kinetics (CK), and expressed as a standardised FFM index (FFMI). FFM was also determined by a criterion method based on a four compartment model (4CM) which is defined as the sum of total body water determined by D2O dilution, TBPr determined by IVNAA, bone mineral determined by DXA, and glycogen estimated to be 4.4% of TBPr. Each patient was meas ured within a four hour period by all methods. Setting: Body Compositi on Laboratory, Monash Medical Centre. Subjects: Six male and twelve fe male CAPD patients (33-77 years). Results: FFMI assessed by DXA and by TBK agreed with measurements of PI on identifying the mean TBPr statu s of the CAPD group as significantly below a comparable normal referen ce population (mean Z score: PI = -1.01 (P < 0.05); FFMI by DXA = -0.5 0 (P < 0.05); FFMI by TBK = -1.24 (P < 0.05)). In contrast, FFMI asses sed by CK did not reveal a significantly reduced TBPr status (mean Z s core: -0.70 (NS)). Furthermore, significant linear correlations were n oted between PI and FFMI estimated by DXA and by TBK (r=0.57 (P < 0.05 ) vs r=0.69 (P < 0.005)) however no significant correlation was observ ed between PI and FFMI estimated by CK (r = 0.36 (NS)). Moderate varia tion in FFM hydration did not compromise the ability of DXA, TBK or CK to differentiate between protein depleted, normal and enriched patien ts. Comparison of FFM estimates between the criterion method and eithe r DXA, TBK or CK revealed no significant bias (+1.8 kg vs -2.0 kg vs 0.8 kg) and respective SEE values of 3.8 kg (8.3%), 5.9 kg (14.3%) an d 9.6 kg (21.7%). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that FFM estimated by either DXA or the whole body counting of TBK is a us eful index of TBPr status in CAPD patients. However, FFM assessed by C K does not appear to be an appropriate index of TBPr status in CAPD pa tients.