We consider the ''one-sided matching'' models of Shapley and Scarf and
Tijs et al. and a one-sided analogue of Demange and Gale's two-sided
matching market. We analyze these games by considering each trader as
both ''buyer'' and ''seller'' and seeing whether results carry over fr
om the two-sided matching literature. For the most part, they do in th
e transferable utility (TU) case but not in the nontransferable utilit
y model. Our results in the TU case parallel work done by Shapley and
Shubik for two-sided markets. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.