Building on the work of Prahalad and Bettis (1986, 1995), the objectiv
e of this article is to generate dialogue for further understanding of
the concept of dominant logic. Our focus is on the level of basic ass
umptions. First, we demonstrate the conceptual plasticity of 'dominant
logic.' Then, we retrofit two relatively unknown concepts-self-refere
nce and scale-with the concept of dominant logic, with its 1995 meanin
g. Finally, we discuss three implications of our venture.