This paper notes the critical response that the 'competence movement'
has received from writers in philosophy of education and argues for a
more positive assessment of what it offers in relation to. (i) the pla
ce of practical competence in a liberal education, (ii) the meritocrat
ic principles underlying the competence movement, (iii) the 'transpare
ncy' of expectations in assessment, and even (iv) the element of pract
ical competence in moral performance. It emphasises, however, that not
all versions of 'competence' can be defended in these terms and that
this requires a more generic and cognitively laden concept of personal
and professional competence.