Following on from a previous article which examined concerns regarding
the growing demand for public examination concessions on the basis of
specific learning difficulties, this article further argues against t
he much used one-off psychometric assessment procedure. The appropriat
eness is queried of a process which does not take into account such ot
her factors as anxiety and emotional disturbance, inappropriate teachi
ng, parental pressure, and socio-cultural opportunity, all of which ca
n produce a very similar pattern of failure. The nature of specific le
arning difficulties is also examined, plus a comment on differing asse
ssment techniques. It was concluded that the 'specific' needs to be pu
t back into an assessment of 'specific learning difficulty' So-called
dyslexia should be identified as the student's major special education
al need and not merely as part of a more general learning problem. To
do otherwise leaves the system open to abuse, and the long-term intere
sts of the students concerned will not be best served. The article doe
s not necessarily reflect the views of Carolyn Blyth's employing autho
rity.