It is now widely recognised that Britain's comprehensive system was ne
ver truly comprehensive. Families with sufficient financial capital we
re always able to ensure the entry of their children to particularly p
restigious 'comprehensive' schools by purchasing a home within the app
ropriate catchment areas. According to government rhetoric, recent leg
islation established a market of schools, removed catchment areas and
gave parents greater choice of school. This case-study examines the wo
rkings of the local quasi-market of schools within a prosperous town (
Sutton Coldfield, England) which is part of the larger metropolitan ar
ea of the West Midlands. Because of a change in the age of entry to se
condary education, Sutton Coldfield was first plunged into the market
in 1992. This case-study shows that the new situation initially caused
confusion and anger. Some Sutton Coldfield residents were denied plac
es for their children within the town and were instead offered places
for their children in Birmingham working-class estate schools. The art
icle describes the formation and activities of a local pressure group
which opposed these changes, and reports the results of a small-scale
study of a sample of parents' choice-making processes in 1993. It is s
hown that access to financial and cultural capital had become more, ra
ther than less, important in the process of allocating children to sec
ondary schools.