THE ROLE OF JUSTICE JUDGMENTS IN EXPLAINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB-SATISFACTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

Citation
Cl. Martin et N. Bennett, THE ROLE OF JUSTICE JUDGMENTS IN EXPLAINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB-SATISFACTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT, Group & organization management, 21(1), 1996, pp. 84-104
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Management,"Psychology, Applied
ISSN journal
10596011
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
84 - 104
Database
ISI
SICI code
1059-6011(1996)21:1<84:TROJJI>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The organizational literature includes a number of studies examining t he relationship between satisfaction and commitment. In all, the discr epant findings characteristic of this research seem to be a function o f both the range of independent variables used by researchers to model the satisfaction-commitment relationship and the choice of satisfacti on-commitment measures. We argue generally that justice judgments am c entral to the development of satisfaction and commitment. Specifically , the literature suggests that procedural justice is closely related t o ''global'' evaluations of systems, leaders, and institutions (e.g., commitment); whereas distributive justice is closely linked to evaluat ions of ''specific'' personally relevant outcomes (e.g., facet satisfa ction). Four competing models linking distributive and procedural just ice to employee satisfaction and commitment were tested using confirma tory analytic techniques. Results suggest that, when considering the r ole of justice judgments, satisfaction and commitment are causally ind ependent implications for both managerial practice and further researc h are discussed.