In final offer arbitration the decision of the arbitrator provides the
parties with information about the preferences of the arbitrator that
is not available prior to the award. Using data from Wisconsin teache
r negotiations from 1977 to 1986, the authors find that the informatio
n contained in an award altered the parties' expectations about the ar
bitrator's preferences and influenced the subsequent negotiated settle
ment. The negotiated settlement following an award was higher when the
union's final offer was selected than when the employer's offer was s
elected. In the round following an award, the variance in negotiated s
ettlements declined, and the wage structure toward which the settlemen
ts converged was one that conformed with the arbitrator's views of fai
rness.