The objective of this study was to demonstrate the reliability of curr
ent and proposed methods for the inspection of swine and other species
for infection with the parasite Trichinella spiralis. Five groups of
pigs were infected with doses of 2500, 500, 100, 50, and 20 T. spirali
s larvae to establish moderate and low-level infections. Pigs were ble
d periodically during the study for samples to be tested by enzyme imm
unoassay (EIA). At the conclusion of the study, pigs were slaughtered
and tissues collected for analyses of worm burdens and for comparison
of digestion testing methods. Comparisons of pooled sample digestion m
ethods were made using inspection methods prescribed by European Union
Directives and the USDA, Code of Federal Regulations. Pooled sample d
igestion testing using 1-g samples was effective for detecting pigs wi
th larval densities of >10 larvae per gram (LPG) of tissue but only pa
rtially effective for pigs with infections of <3 LPG. Pooled sample di
gestion testing using 5-g samples detected all pigs with infection lev
els >1 LPG. The ELA detected all T. spiralis-infected pigs, but did no
t detect infections in some pigs until 49 days after inoculation. Thes
e results demonstrate that the pooled sample digestion method using a
5-g sample size is the most effective inspection method for reducing t
he risk of human exposure to T. spiralis in pork.