Kw. Gates et al., QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF FRESH BLUE-CRAB MEAT HELD AT 0 AND 4-DEGREES-C IN TAMPER-EVIDENT CONTAINERS, Journal of food protection, 59(3), 1996, pp. 299-305
There has been a regulatory movement toward the required use of tamper
-evident containers for fresh blue crab meat. North Carolina passed ta
mper-evident regulations in 1993. Blue crab processors had little info
rmation on possible changes in head-space gases, microbial growth, che
mical decomposition, sensory quality, or shelf life caused by the new
containers. Chemical, microbiological, physical, and sensory changes i
n fresh crab meat were monitored during 18 days of storage in ice and
13 days of storage refrigerated at 4 degrees C. ''Special'' blue crab
meat, chosen for the study, is the least expensive commercial form of
white crab meat. The crab meat was packaged in four retail containers:
copolymer polyethylene cups with polyethylene snap-on lids, copolymer
polyethylene cups with snap-on polyethylene lids fastened to the cup
with heat-shrink low-density polypropylene seals, copolymer polyethyle
ne cans with aluminum easy-open ends, and copolymer polypropylene cups
with a tamper-evident pull-tab on the lid. Control samples packaged i
n industry standard copolymer polyeth ylene cups maintained higher oxy
gen levels than meat stored in tamper-evident containers. No consisten
t differences in quality or shelf Life were detected among the contain
ers. Market shelf life was limited to 6 days for meat held at 4 degree
s C and 15 days for meat held at 0 degrees C. Sensory quality deterior
ated 6 days earlier for crab meat held at 4 degrees C than meat held a
t 0 degrees C. Collateral work showed that toxin production by Clostri
dium botulinum neither occurred following 18 days of storage at 4 degr
ees C nor after 15 days of storage at 10 degrees C. Definite spoilage
occurred before any toxin production. The study suggests that blue cra
b processors can safely use the new tamper- evident packaging, which h
as little or no effect on product quality or shelf life. Processors ma
y choose appropriate packaging options using price, packaging quality,
market appearance, and ease of production as thr deciding criteria.