Lw. Finger et al., A CORRECTION FOR POWDER DIFFRACTION PEAK ASYMMETRY DUE TO AXIAL DIVERGENCE, Journal of applied crystallography, 27, 1994, pp. 892-900
Analysis of a crystal structure using the Rietveld profile technique r
equires a suitable description of the shape of the peaks. In general,
modern refinement codes include accurate formulations for most effects
; however, the functions used for peak asymmetry are semi-empirical an
d take very little account of diffraction optics. The deficiencies in
these methods are most obvious for high-resolution instruments. This s
tudy describes the implementation of powder diffraction peak profile f
ormulations devised by van Laar and Yelon [J. Appl. Cryst. (1984), 17,
47-54]. This formalism, which describes the asymmetry due to axial di
vergence in terms of finite sample and detector sizes, does not requir
e any free parameters and contains intrinsic corrections for the angul
ar dependence of the peak shape. The method results in an accurate des
cription of the observed profiles for a variety of geometries, includi
ng conventional X-ray diffractometers, synchrotron instruments with or
without crystal analyzers and neutron diffractometers.