This paper explores the sequential structure of work processes in a ta
sk unit whose work involves high numbers of exceptions, low analyzabil
ity of search, frequent interruptions, and extensive delibration and t
hat cannot be characterized as routine under any traditional definitio
n. Yet a detailed analysis of the sequential pattern of action in a sa
mple of 168 service interactions reveals that most interactions follow
a repetitive, functionally similar pattern. This apparent contradicti
on presents a challenge to our theoretical understanding of routines:
How can apparently nonroutine work display such a high degree of regul
arity? To answer this question, we propose a new definition of organiz
ational routines as a set of functionally similar patterns and illustr
ate a new methodology for studying the sequential structure of work pr
ocesses using rule-based grammatical models. This approach to organiza
tional routines juxtaposes the structural features of the organization
against the reflective agency of organizational members. Members enac
t specific performances from among a constrained, but potentially larg
e set of possibilities that can be described by a grammer, giving rise
to the regular patterns of action we label routines.