Mf. Henningfield et al., PROTEIN-QUALITY OF ENTERAL NUTRITION PRODUCTS IS CONSISTENT WITH LABEL CLAIMS DURING SHELF-LIFE AND BEYOND EXPIRATION DATE, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95(1), 1995, pp. 46-52
Objective Enteral formulas were monitored during their shelf life and
beyond expiration date to examine protein quality. Design Protein qual
ity was determined by protein efficiency ratio (PER) bioassays and ami
no acid analyses. Setting A certified laboratory performed the PER tes
ts according to procedures established by the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists and recognized by the US Food and Drug Administrat
ion (FDA). The amino acid analyses were performed in our laboratory us
ing validated methods. Samples Commercially available formulas (Ensure
, Osmolite HN, TwoCal HN) that contained protein blends of caseinates
or caseinates with soybean protein isolate were studied. Main outcome
measures Achievement of protein-quality values greater than or equal t
o 70% of the fresh reference casein value as determined by the PER met
hod would be consistent with adequate protein quality as described by
the FDA. Levels of indispensable amino acids that meet or exceed the s
tandards established by the National Research Council of the National
Academy of Sciences are considered high-quality proteins. Levers of am
ino acids throughout shelf life were compared with published label cla
ims. Results Amino acid analyses, which included measurement of trypto
phan and total sulfur amino acids, revealed that both fresh and outdat
ed products met or exceeded standards for proteins of high biologic va
lue and were consistent with label claims. The PER values ranged from
90% to 96% of the control diet for fresh product and 82% to 87% for pr
oducts evaluated after expiration. Conclusion The enteral products stu
died provide high-quality protein throughout the shelf life of the pro
duct.