Attempts at developing a taxonomic classification scheme for knowledge
in the area of strategy contain major shortcomings. With the aim of b
reaking through the limitations inherent in these classification effor
ts, this article rejects the idea that strategic discourse is autonomo
us, and proposes instead that organization theories be considered, sin
ce these allow for the development of discursive forms in the field of
strategy. Four types of strategic discourse are identified; these are
the classical, contingency, socio-political and socio-cognitive forms
. The authors also stress the importance of developing a critical form
of discourse in this area of study.