The behaviour of subjects in ultimatum bargaining experiments is very
different from that predicted by standard theory. These 'anomalies' ar
e frequently explained by fairness considerations. In this paper we co
nsider the possibility that the subjects are simply envious. We derive
the implications of envy for the behaviour in ultimatum games and it
will be shown that envy is a potential explanation for the most import
ant experimental 'anomalies'. This points toward the need to set up ex
periments which allow to discriminate between fairness- and envy-motiv
ated behaviour.