Collective induction is the cooperative search for descriptive, predic
tive, and explanatory generalizations, rules, and principles. We prese
nt a social combination theory of collective induction in the form of
eight postulates. The theory proposes that collective induction entail
s an orderly social combination process of resolution of disagreement
among group members by voting, turntaking, demonstration, and formatio
n of emergent hypotheses, rather than any of these four processes alon
e. Three predictions were derived from the theory and supported for fo
ur-person groups on rule induction problems. First, the theory predict
ed the obtained group hypotheses better than each of the other four pr
ocesses alone. Second, if a correct hypothesis was proposed by at leas
t one group member on some trial there was a high probability (.82) of
a correct final group hypothesis. Third, if a correct hypothesis was
not proposed by at least one group member on some trial there was a ve
ry high probability (.98) of an incorrect final group hypothesis. Disc
ussion considers support for the theory, cognition as collaboration, a
nd boundary conditions. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.