Pr. Philipoom et al., USING NEURAL NETWORKS TO DETERMINE INTERNALLY-SET DUE-DATE ASSIGNMENTS FOR SHOP SCHEDULING, Decision sciences, 25(5-6), 1994, pp. 825-851
The production control system for a shop can be viewed as consisting o
f three sequential stages, the order-promising stage, the order-releas
e stage, and the dispatching (or shop floor) stage. The first stage, w
herein a customer's job arrives and is assigned a due date, provides t
he focus for this research. In particular, the performance of six regr
ession-based due-date assignment rules found in the literature is comp
ared with due dates determined by a neural network. The purpose is to
see whether neural networks hold any promise for application in this a
rea. For the particular shop and the conditions studied, it is found t
hat the neural network outperforms all six conventional rules accordin
g to mean-absolute-deviation (MAD) and standard-deviation-of-lateness
(SDL) criteria, although for one rule on the latter criterion, the dif
ference is not statistically significant. Further analysis indicates t
hat this conclusion generally holds both when the amount of data avail
able is varied and a second, more structured shop is studied. On a thi
rd shop with random routings, the neural network outperforms the best
conventional method according to the MAD measure, but results are mixe
d for the SDL criterion. The superior performance of the neural networ
k leads us also to evaluate a regression model nonlinear in its indepe
ndent variables, a case not considered in the due-date literature. The
nonlinear model generally outperforms the conventional rules on MAD a
nd SDL. The neural network outperforms the nonlinear model on MAD, whi
le the results for SDL are not as clear.