SUPERVISORS ROLE-CONFLICT AND ROLE AMBIGUITY DIFFERENTIAL RELATIONS WITH PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF SUBORDINATES AND THE MODERATING EFFECT OF SCREENING ABILITY
Y. Fried et Rb. Tiegs, SUPERVISORS ROLE-CONFLICT AND ROLE AMBIGUITY DIFFERENTIAL RELATIONS WITH PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF SUBORDINATES AND THE MODERATING EFFECT OF SCREENING ABILITY, Journal of applied psychology, 80(2), 1995, pp. 282-291
Survey data obtained from two independent samples of supervisors (Ns =
68 and 109) supported the prediction that supervisors' experience of
role conflict would correlate positively with their reported tendency
to deliberately inflate subordinates' performance ratings. Contrary to
expectation, in neither sample did supervisors' screening ability eme
rge as a moderator of the relation between role conflict and rating in
flation. In a third independent sample of supervisors (N = 25), in whi
ch rating inflation was operationalized on the basis of actual perform
ance ratings of subordinates, strong support was obtained for both the
predicted positive association between role conflict and rating infla
tion as well as the predicted moderating effect of screening ability o
n this relation. By contrast, the authors did not anticipate that supe
rvisors' experience of role ambiguity would be directly associated wit
h, or interact with screening ability to predict, rating inflation. Th
e data from all three samples were, in general, in line with these exp
ectations.