A dietary guideline, which has been assumed by several countries, is t
o achieve the inclusion of a variety of foods in the diet. The major r
eason for inclusion of food variety as a dietary guideline is the gene
rally accepted concept that eating a wider variety of foods improves n
utrient adequacy. There may also be other reasons why food variety rel
ates to health status. An approach for the development and use of food
variety scores is presented together with a basis and logic for scori
ng food variety. Food variety scores quantify the number of different
foods (individual foods, food mixtures, food categories, or a combinat
ion of these) consumed, and are expressed over a time period or base w
hich may be a day, a week, a month, or a year. The ultimate approach u
sed to calculate food variety may reflect the method by which food int
ake is assessed, the culture within which the score is to be applied,
the definition of a distinct food, and the hypotheses and objectives o
f the study. If a food is consumed, a score of ''one'' is given. There
are no assumptions about quantity, or frequency of consumption. No ad
ditional score is given for larger serving sizes, or if foods are eate
n more than once over the time base. Foods which score are added toget
her to obtain a final food variety score. A major test of the usefulne
ss of food variety scores is their predictiveness of health outcomes,
and whether relationships observed are consistent with biological expl
anations. Food variety, or dietary diversity scores have been used pre
viously to demonstrate that greater dietary diversity is associated wi
th better nutritional adequacy. A greater food variety has also been a
ssociated with improved health status.