Tr. Carretta et Mj. Ree, AIR-FORCE OFFICER QUALIFYING TEST VALIDITY FOR PREDICTING PILOT TRAINING PERFORMANCE, Journal of business and psychology, 9(4), 1995, pp. 379-388
The AFOQT was validated for the prediction of pilot training criteria.
Subjects were 7,563 men and women selected for pilot training on the
basis of educational attainment and AFOQT scores. Criterion variables
included daily flight training grades, check flight grades in subsonic
and transonic aircraft, and overall academic performance in the 53 we
ek pilot training course. Test validities were presented as observed,
corrected for multivariate range restriction, and corrected for multiv
ariate range restriction and unreliability. The Aviation Information a
nd Instrument Comprehension tests, measures of job knowledge, were mos
t predictive of daily and check flights in the initial subsonic jet ai
rcraft. This reflects the relative greater importance of prior job kno
wledge early in training. The Scale Reading test, a measure of percept
ual speed, was most predictive for daily and check flights in the adva
nced transonic training aircraft. The Arithmetic Reasoning test, a goo
d measure of general cognitive ability, was most predictive of aeronau
tics in ground school. The development of an improved pilot selection
composite is suggested by the results of the validity analyses.