The performance of college students who wrote no, 1, or 2 summaries wh
ile studying a text for a recall (fill-in-the-blanks) and recognition
(multiple-choice) test was compared. Students in the 3 groups were mat
ched on total amount of time spent studying. Performance on recall and
recognition measures for students who wrote only 1 summary of an enti
re text was superior to that of students who wrote no or 2 summaries (
1 for each half of the text). These results (a) support the hypothesis
that less frequent summarizing, which requires greater effort, produc
es better performance; (b) rule out total study time as an explanation
for the previously found advantage of summarization; and (c) show tha
t the effect can be obtained for recognition as well as recall measure
s.