''The principles of administration,'' long discredited in public admin
istration, have found a new home: constitutional law. The jurisprudenc
e of the Burger-Rehnquist Court, which appears incoherent to many lega
l scholars, is actually quite coherent with the ''old public administr
ation's'' principles. This article reviews major cases in several diff
erent areas of the law, including due process, search and seizure, and
separation of powers to demonstrate this coherence and explores its n
ormative significance. Particular attention is given to the question o
f official immunity.