This article provides an overview of the existing literature on the de
velopment of metacognition in gifted children and emphasizes needed ar
eas of research. Research examining individual differences in the deve
lopment of declarative metacognitive knowledge, cognitive monitoring,
and the regulation of strategies is reviewed. Differences between patt
erns of gifted and nongifted development differ depending on the type
of metacognition being examined. Specifically, research on declarative
metacognitive knowledge and far transfer shows a monotonic relationsh
ip between metacognitive development and giftedness. Research on spont
aneous use of a variety of both simple and complex strategies is sugge
stive of an acceleration hypothesis (with giftedness effects increasin
g with age). These effects, however, may be domain-specific. Finally,
research on cognitive monitoring suggests only developmental (but no g
iftedness) effects. As a consequence, we argue that it is important to
differentiate the aspect of metacognition being examined before drawi
ng conclusions about the relationships among metacognition, giftedness
, and development. Additionally, an intelligence theory approach may b
e a much less profitable paradigm for understanding the relationship o
f metacognition and giftedness than an exceptional performance paradig
m. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.