The social sciences are particularly self-concious about their methodo
logies, and the distinction between quantitative and qualitative metho
ds is more distinctly drawn than it should be. To some extent, propone
nts of both approaches have exaggerated the differences. Arguments opp
osed to quantitative methods are refutable, and methodological plurali
sm is needed and should be encouraged. Clinical and formulaic approach
es to inquiry may be distinguished, but the two approaches may be used
within the same line of inquiry but at different stages in the proces
s leading from data collection, through analysis and interpretation, t
o utilization of information. In fact, both approaches may be used at
the same points with the additional benefit of permitting triangulatio
n on a closer approximation to the truth.