This article is a discussion of how ideological paradigms shaped durin
g the Cold War might be adapted in high schools to explore critically
the roles played by the United States in world affairs during the last
hall century. The author focuses on two specific paradigms, represent
ed respectively by the work of Paul Gagnon and Noam Chomsky. Whereas G
agnon asserts that examination of flaws in American foreign and milita
ry policies must be tempered by recognition of the legitimate national
security concerns pf policymakers and the difficult dilemmas they fac
e, Chomsky argues that the rela objective of American policies has bee
n geopolitical dominance and that the methods used to realize that obj
ective have been ruthless. The author concludes with the argument that
allowing students to stand outside of both paradigms and explore them
In light of historical evidence will help them to develope a meaningf
ul perspective on the roles played by the U.S. during the Cold War.