Hexane has been used for decades to extract edible oil from cottonseed
. However, due to increased regulations affecting hexane because of th
e 1990 Clean Air Act and potential health risks, the oil-extraction in
dustry urgently needs alternative hydrocarbon solvents to replace hexa
ne. Five solvents, n-heptane, isohexane, neohexane, cyclohexane, and c
ylopentane, were compared with commercial hexane using a bench-scale e
xtractor. The extractions were done with a solvent to cottonseed flake
ratio of 5.5 to 1 (w/w) and a miscella recycle flow rate of 36 mL/min
/sq cm (9 gal/min/sq ft) at a temperature of 10 to 45 degrees C below
the boiling point of the solvent. After a 10-min single-stage extracti
on, commercial hexane removed 100% of the oil from the flakes at 55 de
grees C; heptane extracted 100% at 75 degrees C and 95.9% at 55 degree
s C; isohexane extracted 93.1% at 45 degrees C; while cyclopentane, cy
clohexane, and neohexane removed 93.3, 89.4, and 89.6% at 35, 55, and
35 degrees C, respectively. Each solvent removed gossypol from cottons
eed flakes at a different rate, with cyclopentane being most and neohe
xane least effective. Based on the bench-scale extraction results and
the availability of these candidate solvents, heptane and isohexane ar
e the alternative hydrocarbon solvents most likely to replace hexane.