Dd. Kitts et al., COMPARISON OF SULFADIMETHOXINE RESIDUE ANALYSES IN SALMON MUSCLE USING HPLC AND CHARM-II TEST, Journal of food protection, 58(6), 1995, pp. 678-682
Sulfadimethoxine (SDM) residues in chinook salmon muscle were measured
by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the Charm II tes
t to evaluate the efficacy of the Charm test for the measurement of su
lfonamide residues in fish muscle. Both HPLC and Charm analyses were p
erformed in the presence of salmon tissue matrix for the purpose of ev
aluating the results in field conditions. The sensitivity of the HPLC
method was 0.05 mu g/g (0.05 ppm) for SDM, while the sensitivity of th
e Charm II test was at least 0.01 ppm. SDM analysis from salmon fed Ro
met-30(R) performed using the Charm assay gave consistently lower valu
es compared to HPLC; however, good agreement was obtained between both
methods (tau(2) = 0.944) over a concentration range of 0.1 to 13.0 pp
m in muscle tissue. The large variation in SDM concentrations between
fish sampled on common days suggests that a larger number of fish are
required for more accurate risk assessment. In the current investigati
on, the Charm II test was shown to be effective in measuring SDM in sa
lmon muscle tissue for the large sample throughput common with antibio
tic-screening strategies.