COMPARISON OF SULFADIMETHOXINE RESIDUE ANALYSES IN SALMON MUSCLE USING HPLC AND CHARM-II TEST

Citation
Dd. Kitts et al., COMPARISON OF SULFADIMETHOXINE RESIDUE ANALYSES IN SALMON MUSCLE USING HPLC AND CHARM-II TEST, Journal of food protection, 58(6), 1995, pp. 678-682
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science & Tenology","Biothechnology & Applied Migrobiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
0362028X
Volume
58
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
678 - 682
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-028X(1995)58:6<678:COSRAI>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Sulfadimethoxine (SDM) residues in chinook salmon muscle were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the Charm II tes t to evaluate the efficacy of the Charm test for the measurement of su lfonamide residues in fish muscle. Both HPLC and Charm analyses were p erformed in the presence of salmon tissue matrix for the purpose of ev aluating the results in field conditions. The sensitivity of the HPLC method was 0.05 mu g/g (0.05 ppm) for SDM, while the sensitivity of th e Charm II test was at least 0.01 ppm. SDM analysis from salmon fed Ro met-30(R) performed using the Charm assay gave consistently lower valu es compared to HPLC; however, good agreement was obtained between both methods (tau(2) = 0.944) over a concentration range of 0.1 to 13.0 pp m in muscle tissue. The large variation in SDM concentrations between fish sampled on common days suggests that a larger number of fish are required for more accurate risk assessment. In the current investigati on, the Charm II test was shown to be effective in measuring SDM in sa lmon muscle tissue for the large sample throughput common with antibio tic-screening strategies.