Previous research has shown self-adapted testing to be a promising alt
ernative to computerized adaptive testing. The present study looked at
the importance of item feedback in self-adapted testing. Computerized
adaptive tests and self-adapted tests were compared under both feedba
ck and no-feedback conditions. The self-adapted tests yielded higher t
est performance and lower anxiety than the computerized adaptive tests
regardless of feedback condition These findings indicate that item fe
edback is not necessary for the score differences between self-adapted
testing and computerized adaptive testing to be realized.