It has been said there are few golden rules in life or in advertising.
However, to quote a wise executive, ''A blind pig may sometimes find
truffles, but it helps if he forages in an oak forest'' (Ogilvy and Ra
phaelson, 1982). The modest objective of this study is to understand w
here the oak forest has been for humor and to determine whether all th
e dollars being spent have been turning up truffles. The objective is
not to develop the elusive golden rule but to know more about what has
been done in the past and where success and failure have been most co
mmon in the use of humor. The approach is to study humor by combining
results from studies of TV, radio, and magazines into a common product
contingency framework. The data combines analysis of the frequency of
humor usage for all three media as well as an analysis of the impact
of humorous radio and magazine ads using syndicated industry recall da
ta. The result provides a better understanding of the contingent use o
f humor in different product groupings and in different media as well
as insight about the importance of the relatedness of humor to the pro
duct and the relative effects of humor on attention and comprehension.