This paper examines the schorlary content of four widely adopted intro
ductory sociology textbooks and the scholarly activity of their respec
tive authors. Although all four texts use a wide array of source mater
ial to support their positions, we found substantial differences in th
e sources selected as noteworthy, including a heavy reliance on nonaca
demic sources such as newspapers and weekly magazines. The use of popu
lar sources was associated with the author's scholarly publication rec
ords: stronger records coincided with a more scientifically grounded p
resentation of the discipline. Despite the limitations of the standard
introductory textbook, we view it as the best way to convey the conte
nt of sociology. Also, because most students probably base their perce
ptions of sociology on the introductory course, the textbook plays a p
ivotal role: how source materials are used to present sociology in int
roductory textbooks may affect students' perceptions about the utility
of the discipline.