This paper reports a comparison of the practicality, acceptability and
face validity of five dietary intake methods in two remote Australian
Aboriginal communities: weighed dietary intake, 24-hour recall, 'stor
e-turnover', diet history and food frequency methods. The methods used
to measure individual dietary intake were poorly accepted by the comm
unities. Quantitative data were obtained only from the first three met
hods. The 24-hour recall method tended to produce higher nutrient inta
kes than the weighed intake method and certain foods appeared to be se
lectively recalled according to perceived nutritional desirability. Th
e 'store-turnover' method was most acceptable to the communities and h
ad less potential for bias than the other methods. It was also relativ
ely objective, non-intrusive. rapid, easy and inexpensive. However. fo
od distribution patterns within the communities could not be assessed
by this method. Nevertheless, other similarly isolated communities may
benefit by use of the 'store-turnover' method.