This article chronicles and critiques three primary perpectives reflec
ted in the normative, empirical, and formal theoretical literature on
overhead democracy and the professional state. After demonstrating how
disparate the thinking is on the nature, causes, consequences, and di
lemmas associated with the professional state, the article offers reas
ons for this electicism. Cited are conceptual, contextual, rhetorical,
and normative shortcomings of this otherwise informative literature.
In the process, the article offers several research strategies for dev
eloping midrange and contingency-based descriptive, instrumental, assu
mptive, and normative theories of the political-professional nexus in
the United States.