Gp. Aylward et al., FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE WIDE-RANGE ASSESSMENT OF MEMORY AND LEARNING IN A CLINICAL POPULATION, Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 13(2), 1995, pp. 132-142
The Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML) factor struct
ure is evaluated in a clinical sample of 323 children referred because
of problems in school performance (M age 9.83 years, M grade 4.18, M
FSIQ 95.03). Of these, 72% had attention deficits, whereas 8 to 35% ha
d learning disabilities. Pairwise principal factor analyses with the M
ontanelli and Humphreys criterion produced a three-factor solution tha
t accounted for 36% of the variance: Factor 1 is a Visual Content fact
or (four subtests), factor 2 is a Short-term Verbal factor (2 subtests
), and factor 3 is a Verbal Semantic/Strategic factor (2 subtests). ''
Learning'' subtests did not separate out, and Sound-symbol did not loa
d significantly an any factor. Solutions for the two age divisions of
the test were highly similar. These findings are not consistent with t
he WRAML factor structure reported by the test authors and suggest tha
t alternative means of interpretation be considered. Modality-related
and functional processing dimensions (strategic/nonstrategic, episodic
/semantic) are recommended for clinical use in the evaluation of child
ren's memory.