Researchers have noted that upward influence tactics are often used in
varying patterns and combinations (e.g. Yukl and Falbe, 1990). This s
tudy investigated whether influence strategies representing hard, soft
, or rational approaches to influence behavior would emerge in relatio
n to upward influence tactics of assertiveness, rationality, coalition
, upward appeal, ingratiation, and exchange. Hypotheses were offered c
oncerning the relations of selected demographic, individual difference
, relational, and opportunity factors to these strategies. The 225 par
ticipants were full-time employees of a national non-profit organizati
on. Second-order factor analysis provided some support for the dimensi
onalization of upward influence tactics as representing hard, soft, an
d rational strategies. Each strategy was related to a unique set of pr
edictors. The results suggest a higher level of complexity for influen
ce strategies than previously expected. The implications of this study
, as well as fruitful areas for future research, are discussed. (C) 19
97 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.