Pierre Bourdieu suggests that his concept of habitus should be seen as
a method; a le,ay of thinking about the social world which invites an
understanding of everyday practices as constitutive of social differe
nces. The appeal of habitus lies in its ability to uncover social ineq
ualities in a way that keeps agency and structure simultaneously in fo
cus. However, there are also problems in operationalising habitus, chi
efly because of the indeterminacy of the concept. In order to overcome
these difficulties I have outlined four key components of habitus and
attempted to delineate the aspects of habitus as method that seem mos
t relevant to primary classrooms. Finally drawing on ethnographic data
gathered over 15 months of participant observation in two primary cla
ssrooms, the article seeks to explore through the lens of habitus how
differences of gender, 'race' and class are produced by children in pr
imary classrooms. Although I make no claims for my own empirical work
it does suggest that habitus as method has the potential to reveal the
taken-for-granted inequalities embedded in everyday practices.