E. Davis et E. Ward, HEALTH BENEFIT SATISFACTION IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS - THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIVE AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, Public personnel management, 24(3), 1995, pp. 255-270
One of the most compelling problems outstanding in the field of employ
ee benefits today is trying to control spiraling health care expenditu
res. Furthermore, as a result of the cost containment strategies being
used in health plans in the recent years, health benefit satisfaction
has become an important variable for employers to consider. The purpo
se of this study was to identify how distributive and procedural justi
ce apply to health benefit satisfaction in two different working popul
ations. The study was conducted using public and private sector employ
ees for comparison purposes. MANOVAs and univariate analysis were used
to determine whether any significant differences were revealed betwee
n the two employee groups. Multiple regression was used to evaluate th
e relative contribution of each factor to benefit satisfaction. The re
sults of the analyses revealed that public sector employees experience
d significantly greater benefit satisfaction, normative commitment to
the organization, distributive justice, and greater quality and conven
ience of health care. In both groups, distributive justice (equity per
ceptions) accounted for the greatest amount of variance in benefit sat
isfaction, along with affective commitment. In addition, procedural ju
stice accounted for 7% of the variance in private sector benefit satis
faction. Implications for practicing managers are discussed.