Two experiments investigated whether monitoring is better characterize
d as a domain-specific or a domain-general phenomenon. In Experiment 1
, college students' performance and discrimination accuracy were not c
orrelated across 8 different domains, whereas confidence and judgment
bias were. With tests matched on all salient dimensions except content
, in Experiment 2, students' performance, confidence, discrimination,
and bias were correlated across all or most domains. In addition, conf
idence was correlated even after the effect of performance was removed
. These findings lend qualified support to the domain-general hypothes
is, which states that monitoring within a specific domain is governed
by general metacognitive processes in addition to domain-specific know
ledge. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed, with pa
rticular attention given to the origin and development of the general
monitoring skill.