Il. Marr et al., DIGESTS OR EXTRACTS - SOME INTERESTING BUT CONFLICTING RESULTS FOR 3 WIDELY DIFFERING POLLUTED SEDIMENT SAMPLES, Mikrochimica acta, 119(3-4), 1995, pp. 219-232
Three sets of samples have been investigated in some detail. One set i
s from a river polluted by mine workings, containing substantial level
s of Fe, Mn,Cu, Zn and Ni with traces of many other metals. The second
set consists of typical estuarine sediments contaminated from a wide
range of industrial sources, and the third set consists of oily drilli
ng cuttings from the sea bottom in the vicinity of a North Sea oil pro
duction platform. These samples have been subjected to treatment 1) wi
th EDTA at two different pH's (extracts) 2) with HNO3/H2O2 3) with HNO
3/HCl and 4) with HNO3/HCl/HF (digests). EDTA recoveries, compared to
aqua regia digests, are often very reproducible, not dependent on pH,
and usually significantly low. Nitric/peroxide and aqua regia digests
often give very close results suggesting that these are meaningful val
ues indicating the maximum levels of polluting metals in the sediments
. However, the triple acid digest with HF does sometimes give higher v
alues (and reasonable agreement for CRM's such as MESS-1) but with poo
rer reproducibility.