Advertising has been a frequent target of criticism during its entire
modern era. Most of the criticism has come from ''elite'' observers of
society. In contrast, the general public has historically viewed adve
rtising in a more positive way. To understand the origin of this discr
epancy in opinions about advertising, the study examines how advertisi
ng was portrayed in magazines from 1900 to 1940. Using an ''elitist''-
based categorization of advertising criticisms, the study finds that a
rticles addressing advertising appeared most frequently in fairly elit
e and specialized magazines, and that they were most often positive to
ward advertising. Given the number of years and number of publications
covered by the study, however, the overall number of articles on the
subject was relatively small. Magazines' light and mostly positive cov
erage of advertising suggests that this popular medium may have reflec
ted rather than influenced public opinion, and that editorial boards w
ere interested in pleasing advertisers.