Bp. Gillis et al., NUTRITION INTERVENTION PROGRAM OF THE MODIFICATION OF DIET IN RENAL-DISEASE STUDY - A SELF-MANAGEMENT APPROACH, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95(11), 1995, pp. 1288-1294
Objective To characterize the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (M
DRD) Study nutrition intervention program by determining the frequency
of intervention strategies used by the dietitians and the usefulness
of program components as rated by participants. Design Dietitians reco
rded which of 32 intervention strategies they used at each monthly vis
it. Participants rated the usefulness of 19 program components. Subjec
ts 840 adults with renal insufficiency. Intervention Participants were
assigned randomly to usual-, low-, or very-low-protein diet groups. E
ach eating pattern also specified a phosphorus intake goal. Each parti
cipant met monthly with a dietitian for an average of 26 months.Statis
tical analyses Analyses of variance and chi(2) analyses. Results Dieti
tians used the following intervention strategies most often in all gro
ups: providing feedback based on self-monitoring and/or food records,
reviewing adherence or biochemistry data, providing low-protein foods,
and reviewing graphs of adherence progress. In general, the dietitian
s used feedback, modeling, and support strategies more often, and know
ledge and skills strategies less often, with participants who had to m
ake the greatest reductions in protein intake and those with more adva
nced disease. In all groups, the dietitians' use of knowledge and skil
ls, feedback, and modeling strategies decreased over time (P < .001),
whereas use of support strategies was maintained. The type and frequen
cy of intervention strategies used by dietitians and the usefulness ra
tings of participants did not vary by educational level of the partici
pant. Both self-monitoring and dietitian support were rated as ''very
useful'' by 88% of the participants. Conclusions Three features were c
entral to the MDRD Study nutrition intervention program: feedback, par
ticularly from self-monitoring and from measures of adherence; modelin
g, particularly by providing low-protein food products; and dietitian
support. We recommend the self-management approach.